Optical Gas Imaging Vs. Method 21 for Detecting Hydrocarbon Emissions

Often with Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) surveys, companies are stuck using traditional strategies that aren’t very efficient. In fact, despite recent technological advancements, many businesses seem reluctant to ‘take the plunge' and embrace newer methods that would help them detect fugitive emissions in their operations. The Fugitive Emissions Journal published the following where Terence [...]

April 11th, 2019|General|

TARGET will be at the 2019 ISA Conference in Calgary…drop by our booth!

Terence Trefiak will also be presenting a paper on the topic of "Analysis of the Effectiveness of LDAR Programs". As we move towards the new requirements for fugitive emissions management in Alberta, this is an opportunity to learn from our experience in the US of surveys at 495 separate facilities: - How many and what [...]

April 8th, 2019|General|
X

Savings Calculator

Get an approximation of the reduced cost of our leak detection services using the Alternative Work Practice (AWP) versus traditional Method 21 (M21) methodology for US Gas Plant LDAR compliance with EPA Subpart OOOO by entering the number of Compressors and the Total Components at your gas plant into the calculator below for US Gas Plant LDAR compliance with EPA Subpart OOOO.

 CompressorsTotal
Components
 
 Enter Value
M210 
AWP00%Savings
* Based on average survey stats: Read More About the Benefits of AWP Here
EPA Subpart OOOO Savings Calculator

Savings Calculator

Get an aproximation of the reduced cost of our leak detection services using the Alternative Work Oractice (AWP) versus traditional Method 21 (M21) methodology.

Launch Savings Calculator